Deadlines keep moving
Each release date slips, and the explanation is always a new one. Months pass without a version you can use.
Stalled projects, unstable apps and systems on old versions. We audit the code, fix what hurts daily work, write down how it all fits together, and then support it for as long as you need.


If two or more of these sound familiar, an outside review usually pays for itself. Each one links to a project where we dealt with it.
Each release date slips, and the explanation is always a new one. Months pass without a version you can use.
Reports, salaries or invoices come out wrong, and someone fixes them by hand every month.
Memory grows until the app falls over, or data sync breaks when two records clash.
The system sits on .NET Framework or an old Umbraco release. Security patches get harder, and plugins have no upgrade path.
Small requests take weeks because nobody is sure what a fix will touch. Your team avoids parts of the code.
The person or agency who built it left, stopped answering or moved on. Nobody else knows how it is deployed.
Taking over someone else’s code goes wrong when the new team starts adding features on day one. We start by understanding what is there and making it stable. Only then do we talk about what comes next.
payroll and billing data accuracy in our own time-tracking platform, after we fixed its salary logic, reports, exports and sync conflicts. We treated our own system like a client project. See OSKI Time & CRM
We get access to the repository, hosting, databases and logs. We read the code, check how it is built and deployed, and list what is broken, what is risky and what is fine.
Crashes, wrong numbers and failing jobs come before new features. We fix what hurts daily work and add tests around the logic we touch.
How to build it, how to deploy it, where the data lives and which parts are fragile. Written down in your repository, so the knowledge stays with you.
You get options with trade-offs: keep and improve, upgrade the platform, or rebuild. Sometimes a rebuild is the cheaper path, and we say so.
Bug fixes, updates and small features on an agreed schedule, with the scope and response times set in the contract.
A small AgTech company in Manson, Washington, offers targeted crop treatment with automated drone spraying. A previous developer had delayed and mishandled its software project for more than six months. The owner found OSKI through an online search.
“What stood out most was their commitment to delivering a functional and reliable solution, no matter the challenges.”
Scope, hours and response times are agreed per contract. These are the three kinds of work most support agreements cover, alongside monitoring of logs and background jobs.
Investigation, a fix, a test that covers it and a release. Urgent issues go through the channel and hours you agree with us up front.
Planned updates of .NET, Umbraco and third-party packages, tested before release, with larger upgrades scoped as their own projects.
Small, steady releases that fit the existing code and components, so the system keeps up with the business without a big project.
Production support can be the main job, too. For a manufacturing and shipping business we develop and support its ERP, fixing invoice calculations, order mismatches and concurrency errors as they surface. For a US consultancy we helped quickly when short-turnaround work came in, over four years of white-label delivery.
Jongeneel, a transport company, runs inspections, toolboxes and transport planning on an internal platform. We moved it from Umbraco 8 and .NET Framework to Umbraco 17 on .NET 10. A deprecated plugin was replaced with an equivalent, and xUnit and Moq tests kept checking the business logic the whole way.
Planning an upgrade? See Umbraco development and .NET development. Hosting and pipelines need work too? See Cloud & DevOps.
A rescued project, long-running portals, legacy upgrades and production support for live business systems.
A project stalled for over six months by a previous developer, rebuilt from scratch by one OSKI engineer and delivered on time and on budget.
OSKI developers joined HS High Stake to build modules for a large business portal that links a German division, its dealers and its employees.

Ongoing Umbraco work for Fairway Divorce: form workflows that deliver leads to Salesforce and Mailchimp, reusable components and steady support.

An internal platform for inspections, toolboxes and transport planning, upgraded from Umbraco 8 to Umbraco 17 on .NET 10 with daily workflows intact.

An internal ERP that replaced separate tools for inventory, purchasing, shipping and reporting, with a two-way QuickBooks sync the finance team can rely on.
Custom Umbraco websites and third-party integrations, including Okta, built by OSKI for a California consultancy's own clients from 2021 to 2025.
Quotes from verified Clutch reviews of ongoing and long-running engagements.
Guys proved to be experts in their field.

They're highly knowledgeable and responsive.
They maintained reliability without needing constant oversight, which made the collaboration efficient.

An AI chatbot costs from about $4,200 for a simple bot over a small set of documents to $136,000+ for a multichannel bot that acts in your systems. We break it down by scope, component and rate band, and compare running costs.
A web app costs about $9,000 for a simple internal dashboard to $480,000 for a large multi-tenant platform at Eastern European rates. We break down portals and dashboards by size and component, and show which features move the price.
Custom software costs about $14,000 to $320,000 at Eastern European rates and roughly twice that onshore in the US. We break it down by project type, component and engagement model, and show how to get an estimate you can plan on.
Anything missing? Send us your question and an engineer will answer, usually within one business day.
Contact usYes. For a small AgTech company in Washington, a previous developer had delayed and mishandled the project for more than six months. One OSKI engineer took it over in May 2025, rebuilt the codebase from scratch with current practices and delivered it on time and on budget by the end of June.
It depends on what the audit shows. Often the code can be kept and stabilized, as with our own time-tracking platform, where we fixed salary logic, sync conflicts and memory leaks. Sometimes a rebuild is cheaper and safer, as it was for the AgTech project. You get the reasoning and the options before we commit to either.
What we agree in the contract. Typical scope covers bug fixes, security and framework updates, small features and change requests, and monitoring of logs and background jobs. Larger upgrades or new modules are usually scoped and estimated separately.
Response times, support hours and the channel for urgent issues are agreed per contract, based on how critical the system is and the time zones involved. We do not quote one fixed number for every client. HS High Stake, a long-running client, noted in its review that the team was reachable for urgent tasks.
Yes. We work on code that spans .NET Framework 4.8, ASP.NET Core 3.1 and .NET 5 in the same portal, and we moved Jongeneel’s platform from Umbraco 8 and .NET Framework to Umbraco 17 on .NET 10. Tests kept checking critical logic during that move.
Our rate listed on Clutch is $25–49 per hour, and the minimum project is $1,000. Ongoing support usually runs monthly, either as a dedicated team or as individual engineers. A defined rescue or upgrade can run as a fixed-scope, fixed-price project.
Access to the source code, hosting and databases, any documentation that exists, and a person who knows how the business uses the system. If the previous developer is unreachable, we start from the code and the running system and document as we go.
A spec, a Figma file or three paragraphs is enough to start.

Cookies on oski.solutions
We'd like to use analytics cookies to understand how the site is used, and marketing cookies to measure our ads. They are off unless you allow them. You can change your choice any time via “Cookie settings” in the footer. Cookie policy